The Taiwan Banker

The Taiwan Banker

Editor's note

Articles by Date
2021.09 NO.141
2021.07 NO.139
2021.06 NO.138
2021.05 NO.137
2021.01 NO.133
2020.04 NO.124
2020.03 NO.123
2020.02 NO.122
2020.01 NO.121
2019.12 NO.120
2019.11 NO.119
2019.10 NO.118
2019.09 NO.117
2019.08 NO.116
2019.07 NO.115
2019.06 NO.114
2019.05 NO.113
2019.04 NO.112
2019.03 NO.111
2019.02 NO.110
2019.01 NO.109
2018.12 NO.108
2018.11 NO.107
2018.10 NO.106
2018.09 NO.105
2018.08 NO.104
2018.07 NO.103
2018.06 NO.102
Editor in Chief, The Taiwan Banker
Hank Huang (黃崇哲)
Taiwan’s Financial Industry Should Be Confident on the World Stage 2019.11 The Taiwan Banker NO.119

  Within a few short years Taiwan has moved from failing 16 items of the Asia/Pacific Group on Money Laundering (APG), into the “general tracking list” at the Third Round Mutual Evaluation – a designation shared only by Macao, Indonesia, Hong Kong, and Cook Islands among the 41 countries of the APG. The result serves as international recognition of the Taiwan government’s anti-money laundering (AML) work.

Behind this achievement is the hard work of 37 government departments and 31 industry representatives. Thus, at the AML Evaluation and Celebration Conference, Premier Su Tseng-chang not only presented awards to financial institutions and personnel, but also expressed his gratitude to those in the public and private AML is however just one of many items where Taiwan must comply with international standards. Global financial regulation has long focused on financial resilience to risk events. For instance, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) standards promote capital market stability, reduce credit and market risks in the banking system, and regulate capital adequacy for relevant financial institutions. This APG assessment is based on norms set by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), based in France.

Such organizations with the ability to develop financial regulations are known as International Financial Standard-Setting Bodies (SSB). Other SSBs such as the Financial Stability Board (FSB) and International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) also set specifications for different industries. The design of these systems is however mostly based on the financial environments of advanced economies like the US, EU, and Japan, without considering special conditions and needs of other countries.

Taiwan’s need to operate in international financial markets, due to its large savings surplus, for example, means that many financial indicators have “Taiwanese characteristics.” As a result, difficulties often arise when implementing global regulatory norms, causing delays. Furthermore, developing countries pay more attention to economic growth and poverty alleviation in their development strategies than financial system stability, forming a serious gap with developed countries. This has made the standards less globally applicable.

Therefore, for the sake of global financial inclusion, Taiwan should consider taking a stronger stance in the formation of global regulations, bringing its own experiences into the international discussion to bridge this gap between advanced and developing countries. The World Economic Forum’s 2019 Global Competitiveness Report ranks Taiwan’s financial system sixth among 140 countries, and first in terms of insurance premiums as a percentage of GDP and non-performing loan ratio. With this foundation, it can hold itself out as a transformation model for sound finances among developing countries.

In the future, with its growing international profile, Taiwan’s should more confidently promote its financial expertise overseas. Going against the flow, developing the financial industry internationally, can help Taiwan’s financial system win its due international recognition.