台灣銀行家雜誌

台灣銀行家雜誌

Banker's Digest

Banker's Digest

Are

108.08台灣銀行家雜誌第116期 / By Hank Huang (黃崇哲)

Are Hong Kong’s Best Days Behind It?Editor’s note
In the recent anti-extradition protests in Hong Kong, a large proportion of the city’s residents took to the streets to express their deep misgivings about mainland control. Moreover, multiple outbreaks of violence have aroused the sympathy of Taiwan, situated next door. What does the future hold for this city which was once considered the Pearl of the Orient? And can the financial industry, the backbone of Hong Kong’s economy, emerge unscathed from these disruptions? For a long time, rule of law was regarded as the most important of the many reasons for Hong Kong’s success as a financial center. In this tradition, inherited from the British constitutional system, law is the highest form of social order; everyone is subject to the same restrictions and endowed the same rights under its authority. Only in such a society can the contractual relationship of trust required for financial development be completely protected. A century of experience with this system has given Hong Kong an internationally competitive financial environment. Because of the importance of this legal foundation, the Sino-British Joint Declaration explicitly mentioned that “The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region will be vested with executive, legislative and independent judicial power, including that of final adjudication. The laws currently in force in Hong Kong will remain basically unchanged.” The UK and China agreed to leave Hong Kong’s system intact for 50 years. This confidence that Hong Kong can maintain a society under rule of law has however been gradually shaken, one National People’s Congress interpretation at a time. After all, under the separation of powers of the original common law system, the Basic Law assigned the power of final interpretation to the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress following reunification. In other words, under One Country, Two Systems, it is representatives of Beijing, not Hong Kong, who are authorized to interpret all Hong Kong laws. When Hong Kong’s interests contradict Beijing's, how can one expect the rights of the former to be preserved?In the Chinese legal system, a conflict exists between rule of man (in this case, the Chinese Communist Party) and rule of law. Even though President Xi Jinping said that the Chinese Communist Party's leadership must evolve in a law-based direction, he also rejected the Western path towards “constitutional government,” “separation of powers,” and “judicial independence.” In a “democratic dictatorship” led by the Party, a legal basis for administrative action is already a small step forward. In the end, though, China has a system of "rule by law" rather than the universal concept of "rule of law." The Chinese judicial system is still far from independent and is ultimately subservient to Party interests.Thus, the continued viability of compromise between “rule of law” and “rule by law” will be key to whether Hong Kong, weighed down by the “Chinese dream,” can maintain its status as a financial center. At stake is no less than the concept of property rights. Should they be protected by explicit law, or must they rely upon good governance by individual leaders? This is the question Hong Kong now ponders.Hong Kong's hard-won legal foundations developed gradually over 150 years under the framework of the Colonial Charter, following the seizure of Hong Kong by Queen Victoria of England. By a quirk of history, perhaps, it is relations with the motherland today, following reunification, that pose the greatest challenge to the city's future development. The lights of Victoria Harbor still shine at night, but the question posed by the “Chinese Dream” is whether One Country, Two Systems can support the legal foundation under which Hong Kong matured. Taiwan should carefully consider the fate of its neighbor.

文章分類

名家觀點
封面故事
特別企劃
Banker's Digest
精選
影音專區
綠能
都更
長照
文創
金融科技
全球經濟

最新文章

new! A Fault Tole..
new! CULTURE SHIF..
new! MMT: The End..
new! 純網銀的鯰魚力-將來銀行..
new! 香江變局之台港經貿金融實..

訂閱雜誌

購買本期雜誌

381836
108.08台灣銀行家雜誌第116期繁體中文、台灣金融研訓院

封面故事:香港國際金融中心的未來? 造就香港成為成功金融中心,「法治」(Rule of Law)被視為是最重要的基礎。這項延續於英國憲政體制下的傳統,一切均以法律作為社會中最高的權威,在香港回歸一國兩制後,卻走向中國的依法治國(Rule by Law)改造目標,讓司法系統終就還是無法獨立於行政權之外,與普世認知的法治(Rule of Law)價值,距離相當遙遠,這對香港的國際金融中心的未來影響又會是如何?